top of page

Global crime and injustice

CCGL5048

Online

12:30 – 14:20

Wednesday

2nd semester

Lecture venue
Lecture time
Offer semester
  • This course aims to introduce students to the varied ways of thinking about the crime problem and the consequences of the globalization of economic, political and cultural activities across the world. It introduces a number of key concepts in sociology, criminology and human rights that will help students develop a more inclusive and imaginative picture of how their lives are shaped by events and social institutions far removed from their local contexts and the range of harms that individuals and communities may be subjected to across the global North and South divide. Just as ‘global’ issues such as warfare, human trafficking, and environmental problems must be understood in an international context, so too must traditionally ‘local’ arenas of criminological interest be located within a comparative perspective, and understood as being shot-through with transnational and global dimensions. Overall, the course will examine whether and how globalization may bring various risks and new harms which challenge our conventional understanding of the problem of crime and justice.


    In this context, there is growing recognition of the importance of new geographical sites of knowledge production, in particular those beyond traditional Anglo-American bases of power. This course will therefore equip students with the theoretical and methodological tools to ‘reach for the global’ in their criminological imagination by drawing on a range of case-studies framed from the global and comparative perspective.


    Study load

    Activities

    Number of Hours

    Lectures

    24

    Tutorials

    11

    Reading / self-study

    25

    Assessment: Essay / report writing

    30

    Assessment: Debate

    20

    Assessment: Group project

    40


  • On completing the course, students will be able to:

    1. Describe and explain the different ways of understanding crime and justice in a local and global context and the links between the two.

    2. Reflect on the contemporary debates surrounding the nature, politics and efficacy of crime, social harm and their control.

    3. Apply interdisciplinary concepts and ideas to the study of crime, its differential impact on social groups, and global responses to crime and social harm.

    4. Apply active learning skills and cooperate in group work and novel situations.


  • Tasks

    Weighting

    Problem-based learning sessions

    30%

    Individual self-reflection portfolio

    30%

    Group project

    40%


  • 2-3 article or chapter length readings will be assigned as required readings per week.  The following list is tentative, but will include readings such as:

    • Anderson, E. (1994, May).  The Code of the Streets. The Atlantic. From http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1994/05/the-code-of-the-streets/306601/

    • Andrijasevic, R., & Walters, W. (2010). The international organization for migration and the international government of borders. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 977-999.

    • Brafman, O., & Beckstrom, R. A. (2006). The starfish and the spider: The unstoppable power of leaderless organizations. [pp. 31-53]

    • Brown, W. (2010). Walled states, waning sovereignty. New York: Zone. [pp. 7-42]

    • Brulle, R. J.  (2016, January 6). America has been duped on climate change. The Washington Post. From https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/01/06/america-has-been-lied-to-about-climate-change/?tid=pm_opinions_pop_b

    • Campbell, C.  (2002/1972). The cult, the cultic milieu and secularization. In J. Kaplan & H. Lööw (Eds.), The cultic milieu: Oppositional subcultures in an age of globalization (pp.12-25). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

    • Castells, M. (2003). The global criminal economy. In E. McLaughlin, et al. (Eds), Criminological Perspectives – Essential Readings (2nd ed., pp. 516-526). London: Sage.

    • Florida, R.  (2005, October). The world is spiky. The Atlantic, 48-51.

    • Fraser, A. (2013). Street habitus: Gangs, territorialism and social change in Glasgow. Journal of Youth Studies16(8), 970-985.

    • Giddens, A.  (2004, November 10). The future of world society: the new terrorism.  Lecture delivered at the London School of Economics.

    • Hagedorn, J. (Ed.). (2007). Gangs in the global city: Alternatives to traditional criminology. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. [Chap. 1]

    • Haggerty, K. D. (2009). Modern serial killers. Crime, Media, Culture, 5(2), 168-187.

    • Hiebert, M. S. (2011). The role of globalization in the causes, consequences, prevention, and punishment of genocide. [pp. 193-222]

    • Hobbs, D. (1998). Going down the glocal. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice37(4), 1-19.

    • Izadi, E. (2015, December 18). One out of 122 humans today has been forced to flee their home, U.N. says. The Washington Post.  From https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/12/18/one-out-of-122-humans-today-has-been-forced-to-flee-their-home-u-n-says/?postshare=831450473731792&tid=ss_mail

    • Jensen, D. (2009). Forget shorter showers. Orion magazine.

    • Joosse, P. (2012). Elves, environmentalism, and ‘eco-terror’: Leaderless resistance and media coverage of the earth liberation front.  Crime, Media, Culture8(1), 75-93.

    • Joosse, P., Bucerius, S., & Thompson, S. K. (2015). Narratives and counternarratives: Somali-Canadians on recruitment as foreign fighters to al-Shabaab.  British Journal of Criminology, 55(4), 811-832.

    • Li, J. (2014). The religion of the nonreligious and the politics of the apolitical: The transformation of Falun Gong from healing practice to political movement. Politics and Religion, 7(01), 177-208.

    • Lo, T. W. (2012). Triadization of youth gangs in Hong Kong. British Journal of Criminology52(3), 556-576.

    • Mascarenhas, M. (2015).  Environmental Inequality and Environmental Justice. In K. Gould & T. Lewis (Eds.), Twenty lessons in environmental sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    • Molland, S. (2011). “I am helping them”: “Traffickers”, “anti-traffickers” and economies of bad faith. Australian Journal of Anthropology, 22, 236-254.

    • Oriola, T., Haggerty, K., & Knight, A. W. (2013). Car bombing ‘with due respect’: The Niger Delta insurgency and the idea called MEND. African Security6(1), 67-96.

    • Pickering, S. (2014). Floating carceral spaces: Border enforcement and gender on the high seas. Punishment & Society16(2), 187–205.

    • Sandberg, S., Oksanen A., Berntzen, L. Erik., & Kiilakoski, T. (2014). Stories in action: the cultural influences of school shootings on the terrorist attacks in Norway. Critical Studies on Terrorism7(2), 277-296.

    • Stark, R. (1987). How new religions succeed: A theoretical model. The future of new religious movements. [pp. 11-29]

    • Van Veeren, E. (2014). Materializing US security: Guantanamo’s object lessons and concrete messages. International Political Sociology8(1), 20–42.

    • Wright, R. (2004). Fool’s Paradise. A Short History of Progress. House and Anansi. [pp. 55-79]

    • Zelinsky, A., & Shubik, M.  (2009). Research note: Terrorist groups as business firms: A new typological framework. Terrorism and Political Violence21(2), 327-336.

  • To be announced

Dr Paul Joosse

Associate Professor

Dr Paul Joosse
Course co-ordinator and teachers
bottom of page